The 3X Rule: Your Path to Money That Never Runs Out

Rick: Shyam, can I ask you something that’s been on my mind?
How can people invest just five thousand a month, and later withdraw fifteen thousand a month… for the rest of their lives?
How does that even add up?

Shyam: It sounds impossible only until you understand two ideas:
compounding and discipline.
Most people underestimate both.

Let’s start with compounding.

Rick: Go on. I’m listening.

Shyam: Imagine you plant a sapling in your backyard.
For the first few years, it hardly grows.
Tiny. Slow. Boring.
But after 10 to 12 years, it starts shooting up fast — the trunk thickens, branches grow rapidly, fruits start appearing.

Money works exactly like that.
Not in year 1 or 2…
but in year 10, 12, 15…
that’s when the real explosion happens.

Compounding rewards those who stay long enough.

Rick: So the 5,000 per month becomes something meaningful only because it stays long?

Shyam: Exactly.
Let’s quantify it:

5,000 a month for 15 years becomes about 24 lakh rupees.

Not because you invested a lot.
But because you stayed disciplined for long enough
for compounding to wake up.

Rick: Fine, I get the compounding part.
But how does that give me fifteen thousand a month later?

Shyam: Before I answer that, let me show you something simple.
Let’s call it the Sustainable Withdrawal Cheat Sheet.

If your investments earn:
8% returns → you can safely withdraw 3–4% for life
10% returns → withdraw 3–5% for life
11–12% returns → withdraw 4–6% for life
13–15% returns → withdraw 5–7% for life (maybe sustainable)
15%+ returns → 6–8% withdrawals only for short periods

This is not theory. It’s global research used for retirement planning worldwide.

Rick: So… to never run out of money, my withdrawals must be lower than my returns?

Shyam: Correct.
If your money earns 10% and you withdraw 4%, your money grows.
If your money earns 12%  and you withdraw 6% your money stays stable.
If your money earns 12% and you withdraw 12%, your money dies.

This is the whole science.

Rick: Okay. But how does this explain the fifteen-thousand withdrawal?

Shyam: Let’s connect the dots.

You invest ₹5,000/month for 15 years.
You get a corpus of ₹24 lakhs.
Now imagine your investment continues growing at roughly 11–12%, which historically many diversified funds do over long periods.

Using the cheat sheet:
At 11–12% returns, you can safely withdraw 4–6% per year for life.

So for a ₹24 lakh corpus:

4% withdrawal = ₹96,000 per year = ₹8,000 per month
5% withdrawal = ₹1.2 lakh per year = ₹10,000 per month
6% withdrawal = ₹1.44 lakh per year = ₹12,000 per month

Now here’s the part most people miss:

Your ₹24 lakh corpus doesn’t remain ₹24 lakh.
It continues compounding at 11–12%.
So even if you withdraw around ₹15,000 a month (about 7.5%), the underlying money keeps growing enough to support it.

Why?
Because compounding is still working behind the scenes.

Withdrawals don’t stop the engine — they only tap into it.

Rick (thinking): So a small disciplined SIP gives me a big enough engine…
and because that engine keeps earning more than I withdraw,
it continues paying me for life.

Shyam: Exactly.
You’re withdrawing three times what you used to invest. Not because of luck,
but because your withdrawal rate is controlled and your compounding rate is higher.

Rick: This suddenly makes sense.
It’s not magic — it’s math plus patience.

Shyam: That’s the line, Rick. Money rewards those who do small things consistently…
and then have the patience to let compounding do the heavy lifting.

Rick: So, in one sentence?

Shyam: Sure.
Discipline builds the corpus.
Compounding grows it.
And safe withdrawals keep it alive forever.

Rick (smiles): I think this is the first time money feels… understandable.

Tax-Saving GPS: How Incentives Guide Us to Financial Security

Amit: Hey Riya, I was reading about the debate on whether tax incentives are necessary for savings. Some say they help build habits, while others feel they’re just a way for the government to manipulate financial choices. What do you think?

Riya: Great question! Let me put it this way—have you ever used Google Maps while driving?

Amit: Of course! It helps me avoid wrong turns and gets me to my destination efficiently.

Riya: Exactly! Think of tax-saving investments as a GPS for your finances. When you start earning, there are so many tempting “wrong turns”—gadgets, vacations, luxury expenses. Without a guiding system, many people would just spend, thinking they’ll save “someday.”

Amit: That makes sense. So, tax-saving schemes like ELSS or PPF act as the GPS that nudges people in the right direction?

Riya: Yes! In the beginning, people invest in tax-saving instruments just for the short-term benefit—like following a GPS only because they don’t know the route. But over time, they realize the real power of these investments, just like how regular drivers eventually memorize the best routes.

Amit: But what about people who already know how to save? Do they really need tax benefits?

Riya: That’s like saying experienced drivers don’t need road signs. Sure, they might not rely on them as much, but signs still help guide traffic, maintain discipline, and prevent chaos. Similarly, tax incentives help a huge middle group—the “fence-sitters”—who might otherwise delay or avoid saving.

Amit: I get it now! And the lock-in period in tax-saving investments is like being forced to take a slightly longer but safer road, ensuring you don’t take an impulsive shortcut.

Riya: Exactly! You stay invested long enough to see the magic of compounding, get comfortable with market ups and downs, and develop long-term investing habits. What started as a tax-saving move turns into a habit—just like how using a GPS initially leads you to discover better routes, even without guidance later on.

Amit: That’s a great way to look at it! But with the new tax regime, where incentives are being reduced, won’t this GPS be taken away?

Riya: That’s the challenge. While a simplified tax system is good, we need to find new ways to nudge people towards saving. Maybe we need a different kind of “financial GPS” that works without tax benefits but still encourages good habits.

Amit: Makes sense! Just like how cars now have built-in navigation systems, maybe financial planning should become second nature without needing tax incentives.

Riya: Exactly! The goal isn’t to force people to save, but to make it easier for them to take the right path. A little guidance at the start can lead to a lifetime of good financial decisions.

Amit: Got it! From now on, I’ll think of tax-saving investments as my financial GPS—helping me stay on track towards long-term wealth.